Data Products ›› LANDFIRE National Product Descriptions

FRCC Departure Index

The Fire Regime Condition Class (FRCC) Departure Index data product uses a range from 0 to 100 to depict the amount that current vegetation has departed from simulated historical vegetation reference conditions (Hann and Bunnell 2001; Hardy and others 2001; Hann and others 2004; Holsinger and others 2006). This departure results from changes to species composition, structural stage, and canopy closure. LANDFIRE produces maps of FRCC Departure Index using methods derived from the Interagency Fire Regime Condition Class Guidebook (Hann and others 2004; Holsinger and others 2006). For a more detailed technical description, read Developing the LANDFIRE Fire Regime Data Products (Rollins and others 2007). It is important to note that the LANDFIRE FRCC layer represents the departure of current vegetation conditions from simulated historical reference conditions, which is only one component of the FRCC characterization outlined in Hann and others (2004). LANDFIRE simulates historical vegetation reference conditions using the vegetation and disturbance dynamics model LANDSUM (Keane and others 2002; Keane and others 2006; Pratt and others 2006). Current vegetation conditions are derived from a classification of LANDFIRE layers of existing vegetation type, cover, and height.

Click here for example case studies on applying LANDFIFRE FRCC data products.

Click here for complete metadata.

Back to National Products

Hann, W. J. and D. L. Bunnell, 2001. Fire and land management planning and implementation across multiple scales. International Journal of Wildland Fire 10:389-403.

Hann, W.; Shlisky, A.; Havlina, D.; Schon, K.; Barrett, S.; DeMeo, T.; Pohl, K.; Menakis, J.; Hamilton, D.; Jones, J.; Levesque, M.; Frame, C. 2004. Interagency Fire Regime Condition Class Guidebook. Last update October 2007: Version 1.3. [Homepage of the Interagency and The Nature Conservancy fire regime condition class website, USDA Forest Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, The Nature Conservancy, and Systems for Environmental Management]. [Online]. Available: www.frcc.gov.

Hardy, C. C., K. M. Schmidt, J. M. Menakis, and N. R. Sampson. 2001. Spatial data for national fire planning and fuel management. International Journal of Wildland Fire 10:353-372.

Holsinger, L, R.E. Keane, B. Steele, M. Reeves, and S.D. Pratt. 2006a. Using historical simulations of vegetation to assess departure of current vegetation conditions across large landscapes. Pp. 315-366 in: Rollins, M.G. and C.K. Frame, tech. eds. 2006. The LANDFIRE Prototype Project: nationally consistent and locally relevant geospatial data for wildland fire management. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-175.. U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado.

Keane, R. E., R. Parsons, and P. Hessburg. 2002. Estimating historical range and variation of landscape patch dynamics: limitations of the simulation approach. Ecological Modeling 151:29-49.

Keane, R.E.; L. M. Holsinger, and S.D. Pratt. 2006. Simulating historical landscape dynamics using the landscape fire succession model LANDSUM version 4.0 Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-171CD. US Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Fort Collins, Colorado: 73 p.

Pratt, S.D., L. Holsinger, and R.E. Keane. 2006. Using simulation modeling to assess historical Reference conditions for vegetation and fire Regimes for the landfire prototype project. Pp. 277-315 in: Rollins, M.G. and C.K. Frame, tech. eds. 2006. The LANDFIRE Prototype Project: nationally consistent and locally relevant geospatial data for wildland fire management. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-175.. U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado.